W0227
Does Warming a Lysozyme Solution Cook Ones Data?
Marc Puseya), Michael Burkeb), and Russell
Judgeb); a)Biophysics SD48, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, AL
35812; b)Univ. of Alabama at Huntsville, Huntsville, AL
35899
Chicken egg white lysozyme has a well characterized thermally
driven phase transition. Between pH 4.0 and 5.2, the transition temperature, as
defined by the point where the tetragonal and orthorhombic solubility are equal,
is a function of the pH, salt (precipitant) type and concentration, and most
likely of the buffer concentration as well1,2. This phase transition
can be carried out with protein solution alone, prior to the initiation of the
crystallization process. We have now measured the kinetics of this process and
investigated its reversibility. An aliquot of a stock protein solution is held
at a given temperature, and at periodic intervals used to set up batch
crystallization experiments. The batch solutions were incubated at 20(C until
macroscopic crystals were obtained, at which point the number of crystals in
each well were counted. The transition effects increased with temperature,
slowly falling off at 30(C with a half time (time to ~1/2 the t = 0 number of
crystals) of ~ 5 hours, and an estimated half time of ~ 0.5 hours at 43(C.
Further, the process was not reversible by simple cooling. After holding a
lysozyme solution at 37(C (prior to addition of precipitant) for 16 hours, then
cooling and holding it at 4(C, no return to the pre-warmed nucleation kinetics
are observed after at least 4 weeks. Thus every thermal excursion above the
phase transition point results in a further decrease in the nucleation rate of
that solution, the extent being a function of the time and temperature.
Orthorhombic lysozyme crystals apparently do not undergo the flow-induced growth
cessation of tetragonal lysozyme crystals. We have previously shown that
putting the protein in the orthorhombic form does not affect the averaged face
growth kinetics, only nucleation, for tetragonal crystals3. We may
be able to use this differential behavior to elucidate how flow affects the
lysozyme crystal growth process.
References:
1. E. L. Forsythe and M. L. Pusey, J.Cryst.Growth
168, 112-117 (1996).
2. F. Ewing, E. Forsythe, M. Pusey, Acta Cryst.
D50, 424-428 (1994).
3. F. L. Ewing, E. L. Forsythe, M. van der Woerd, M. L. Pusey,
J.Crystal Growth 160, 389-397 (1996).