W0221
Crystal Structure Determination Using In-House Chromium
X-Ray Source. Zhi-Jie Liu1, John Rose1, Wolfram
Tempel1, Ashit Shah1, Doowan Lee1, Jeff
Habel1, Gary Newton1, Chwan-Deng Hsiao2 and
Bi-Cheng Wang1, 1Southeast Collaboratory for Structural
Genomics, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens,
GA 30602, 2Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang,
Taiwan, Taipei, 115, ROC.
Solving protein crystal structures using only the native
crystals by a process we termed Direct Crystallography has been our long-term
interest. Sulfur, existing in almost every protein, has been used as the phasing
probe in our previous studies (1,2). As a test if X-rays with wavelengths that
are longer than Cu-radiation would enhance the success rate of sulfur phasing,
we have recently installed an Osmic CMF optic to a RU-200 generator system with
a Cr anode. From Cu X-rays
(
λ
= 1.54 Å) to Cr X-rays (
λ = 2.29Å)
the value of
Δf” is more than doubled from
0.56 e
- to 1.15 e
-. Following this known fact, a question
may be asked: does doubling of the
Δf”
value alone make a significant difference in sulfur phasing, in view of many
other factors which may be unfavorable for data collection at a longer
wavelength?
Since the installation of our Cr source, four sets of
diffraction data have been collected in the last 30 days. We have now solved all
four structures by sulfur phasing with data collected on a R-AXIS IV imaging
plate detector. The use of longer wavelength X-rays indeed significantly
increases the success rate of sulfur phasing. Details of the experimental
aspects and results will be presented.
Wang BC. (1985). Methods Enzymol, 115:90-112.
Liu, Z.-J., Vysotski, E. S., Chen, C. J., Rose, J. P., Lee,
J., and Wang, B.C. (2000). Protein Sci. 9, 2085-2093
Work supported in part with funds from the National Institute
of Health (GM62407), The Georgia Research Alliance, and The University of
Georgia Research Foundation, Rigaku/MSC, IBM.